Developmental disabilities project final lit review

It may be that including these design elements is now considered to be such common practice that that the authors did not feel the need to mention them as specific strategies in their articles.

We a set of criteria to determine which of the articles, published since the yearwould be included in the review e. Orienting the user and helping them avoid errors was viewed as another important design element; it was referenced 44 times.

We used 36 search term combinations i. Here, the tried and true principles of providing instructions, prompts, and other error prevention strategies 33 referencesalong with error identification and recovery 21 referenceswere high on the list.

Finally, WebAIM will soon test items with users who have cognitive or learning disabilities to see if individual features make actual differences in their web experiences. Interestingly, recommendations to use a home button or contact mechanisms were rarely mentioned.

These include fairly intuitive principles such as chunking or grouping content. In the literature reviewed, there were 26 explicit references to this principle. What is its impact on users? Will feedback on the item be useful to developers?

The use of both images 54 and audio or other multimedia 52 were frequently mentioned as exemplars of this. Language Use and Reading Certainly developers know that providing simple language and an appropriate reading level for their content is important for all users, and clearly important for users with cognitive or learning disabilities.

Design items that contributed to the ability of the user to navigate or interact with the site were referenced 54 times. Thus this category was cited more often than any other single category.

Many articles made reference to the importance of alternative formats 47 references with compatibility to screen readers or self-voicing technologies appearing in moderate levels 38 references. More specifically, the recommendation to use simple designs was by far the most prevalent 39 references.

Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Literature Review

The elements that enhance the visual readability of text were mentioned at relatively low levels for their perceived importance. The use of captions and transcripts were identified as helpful for those with cognitive or learning disabilities, albeit at low levels.

The frequency with which literature review items appeared in this category may rest in the fundamental notion that learners develop different styles to learn based on areas in which they have strengths.

Six categories or themes of recommendations emerged in this pool of literature. Reducing the amount of overall text was similarly called out across several articles, as was the need to avoid non-literal text, colloquialisms, jargon, or abbreviations.

Although most of the recommendations found in the literature reviewed share an end goal of enhancing user comprehension of web-based content, there are several specific design techniques that emerged to address comprehension directly.Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Literature Review.

WebAIM Projects > Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Literature Review. Article Contents. Current page: Page 1: Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Literature Review Introduction; Method in brief; Adobe partnered with WebAIM so that the final product could be used as an extension.

INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES IN FLORIDA. A Review of Literature. Table of Contents final conclusions based on the literature search. Relevant Legislation mental illnesses, developmental disabilities, and other severe disabilities was a policy of.

developmental delay or additional needs aged years.

In preparing for literature review, a thorough search of the academic and ‘grey’ literature for the. SUPPORTS FOR SINGLE PARENT CAREGIVERS: REVIEW OF EXISTENT LITERATURE DELIVERABLE: FINAL REPORT activities of the project included: A.

A Review of the Literature on Existent Supports for Single Parent Caregivers to: with cystic fibrosis or developmental disabilities). The results of this literature review.

FINANCIAL LITERACY FOR YOUTH WITH DISABILITIES DELIVERY ORDER: Literature Review Government Contract Number: DOLUFL LEAD AUTHORS Kavita Mittapalli, PhD, Sarah Irvine Belson, PhD and Halima Ahmadi, MPH Project Director: Dr.

Douglas Klayman [email protected] with disabilities, and. Literature Review: The incidence and prevalence of autism; what evidence is there of an autism epidemic? the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP). Lancet,Mental Retardation and.

Developmental disabilities project final lit review
Rated 5/5 based on 40 review